People v. R.V.
California Supreme Court
1Dissent
CHIN, J.,
Dissenting. — I agree with the majority that, under Welfare and Institutions Code section 709,1 a minor is presumed competent and bears the burden of proving otherwise by a preponderance of the evidence. However, under the deferential standard of appellate review that applies in light of this conclusion, I would affirm the juvenile court’s finding that R.V. was competent. I therefore dissent.
1. The Standard of Review.
The standard of appellate review that applies here follows from (1) the majority’s conclusion, with which I agree, that R.V. bore the burden of proving incompetency by a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- People v. WolffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.