Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. R.V.

California Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 2015No. S212346Published

1Dissent

CHIN, J.,

Dissenting. — I agree with the majority that, under Welfare and Institutions Code section 709,1 a minor is presumed competent and bears the burden of proving otherwise by a preponderance of the evidence. However, under the deferential standard of appellate review that applies in light of this conclusion, I would affirm the juvenile court’s finding that R.V. was competent. I therefore dissent.

1. The Standard of Review.

The standard of appellate review that applies here follows from (1) the majority’s conclusion, with which I agree, that R.V. bore the burden of proving incompetency by a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. People v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. People v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. People v. WolffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API