Legal Opinion
Amador-Stewart v. Snooze HIC, LLC
District Court, S.D. California
Decided September 23, 2019No. 3:18-cv-01604Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TRINITY AMADOR-STEWART CASE NO. 18cv01604-LAB-MDD Plaintiff, 12 ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION vs. TO DISMISS 13 SNOOZE HIC LLC and DOES 1 14 through 100, inclusive, 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff Trinity Amador-Stewart brought this putative class action against 19 Defendant Snooze HiC, LLC for unpaid overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act 20 (FLSA) and California Labor Code, seeking unpaid overtime, unpaid compensation for 21 interrupted and/or missed meal and rest periods, and failure to pay minimum…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Warren v. Fox Family Worldwide, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Greg Landers v. Quality Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.