Legal Opinion

May v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided January 10, 1990No. 05-8801324-CRPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KINKEADE, Justice.

Frank Delvis May appeals his conviction of the misdemeanor offense of driving while intoxicated. Following a jury trial, the court assessed punishment at sixty days’ confinement and payment of an $850.00 fine. May argues that the trial court erred in refusing to grant him a mistrial after admitting in the hearsay evidence of the intoxilyzer machine readout. Further, May argues that the trial court erred in permitting the State to introduce evidence regarding the intoxication of May’s passenger. Finally, May argues that the trial court erred in allowing the testimony…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vanderbilt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Mallory v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  3. Harrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. United States v. Harold James Taylor and Woodrow HunterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Williams v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1997
  2. Henderson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
  3. Stevenson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1996
  4. Ex Parte May, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
  5. Ly v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API