Ly v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TAFT, Justice.
Appellant was convicted of aggravated perjury. The court assessed punishment at three-years confinement. Appellant was released on an appeal bond, conditioned upon his participation in the Electronic Monitoring Supervision Program. 1 The court order required appellant to remain on home curfew between 9 p.m. and 8 a.m. daily.
We are asked to review the admissibility of computer generated records and the sufficiency of such evidence in proving appellant violated his curfew as a basis for the trial court’s bail revocation. We affirm.
Facts
On June 20, 1995, at 9:13 p.m., the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Vanderbilt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Harrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Murray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Shannon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1990
- Burleson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. HawkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Commonwealth v. ThissellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
- Stevenson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1996
- Pina v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001
- Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.