Legal Opinion

Ly v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided October 12, 1995No. 01-95 00789-CRPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TAFT, Justice.

Appellant was convicted of aggravated perjury. The court assessed punishment at three-years confinement. Appellant was released on an appeal bond, conditioned upon his participation in the Electronic Monitoring Supervision Program. 1 The court order required appellant to remain on home curfew between 9 p.m. and 8 a.m. daily.

We are asked to review the admissibility of computer generated records and the sufficiency of such evidence in proving appellant violated his curfew as a basis for the trial court’s bail revocation. We affirm.

Facts

On June 20, 1995, at 9:13 p.m., the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Vanderbilt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Harrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Murray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Shannon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1990
  5. Burleson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. HawkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Commonwealth v. ThissellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  3. Stevenson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1996
  4. Pina v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001
  5. Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API