Legal Opinion

Harrell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 17, 1986No. 720-85PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

W.C. DAVIS, Judge.

The San Antonio Court of Appeals reversed appellant’s conviction for driving while intoxicated, holding that the test results and interpretation thereof from appellant’s breath test should not have been admitted at trial. The Court held that the State failed to show a part of the intoxilyzer equipment was individually certified as required by the Breath Alcohol Testing Regulations (hereinafter “regulations”) promulgated by the Texas Department of Public Safety. See V.A.C.S. Article 6701Z -5 and Tex. Dept, of Public Safety,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1953
  2. Cody v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. French v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. Palafox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Bumpus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Mata v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  2. Reynolds v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  3. Henderson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
  4. Ray v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1988
  5. Thomas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API