Harrell v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
W.C. DAVIS, Judge.
The San Antonio Court of Appeals reversed appellant’s conviction for driving while intoxicated, holding that the test results and interpretation thereof from appellant’s breath test should not have been admitted at trial. The Court held that the State failed to show a part of the intoxilyzer equipment was individually certified as required by the Breath Alcohol Testing Regulations (hereinafter “regulations”) promulgated by the Texas Department of Public Safety. See V.A.C.S. Article 6701Z -5 and Tex. Dept, of Public Safety,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1953
- Cody v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- French v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Palafox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Bumpus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Mata v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Reynolds v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Henderson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
- Ray v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1988
- Thomas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.