Legal Opinion
National Institute of Family & Life Advocates v. Harris
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 14, 2016No. 16-55249PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION. D.W. NELSON, Senior Circuit Judge:
The National Institute of Family and Life Advocates, et al. appeal from the district court’s denial of them motion for a preliminary injunction to prevent the enforcement of the California Reproductive Freedom, Accountability, Comprehensive Care, and Transparency Act (the FACT Act or the Act). The Act requires that licensed pregnancy-related climes disseminate a notice stating the existence of pub licly-funded family-planning services, including contraception and abortion. The Act also requires that unlicensed clinics disseminate a notice stating…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Rosenberger v. Rector & Visitors of University of VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. BecerraSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Planned Parenthood Ind. & Ky., Inc. v. Comm'r of the Ind. State Dep't of HealthCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Retail Digital Network v. Ramona PrietoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Greater Baltimore Center for Pregnancy Concerns, Inc. v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- Duy Mai v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.