Hasekamp v. Superior Equipment Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DOERNER, Commissioner.
By this action plaintiffs sought an injunction to enjoin and restrain the defendant from using its property as an alleged “Contractor’s plant or storage yard,” one of the uses prohibited by § 902.020 of the St. Louis Zoning Code in the “F” Local Business District. Defendant conceded that its property was located in that district and admitted that the operation of a contractor’s plant and storage yard was prohibited by the Zoning Code, but it denied that its business was operated in violation of the Code; pleaded that plaintiffs’ petition failed to state a claim upon…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dougherty-Moss Lumber Co. v. ChurchillMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
- Schaeffer v. MooreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
- Rider v. JulianSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
- Suburbia Gardens Nursery, Inc. v. County of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- Kellog v. Joint Council of Women's Auxiliaries Welfare Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Citizens for Safe Waste Management v. St. Louis CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- State Ex Rel. Ellis v. LiddleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- City of Louisiana v. BranhamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Coots v. J. A. Tobin Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- Trantina v. Board of TrusteesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.