Legal Opinion

Clarkson v. Dunning

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1889PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from special term, Westchester county. Action by Theodore Clarkson against Prances G. Dunning, to set aside conveyance to defendant by William B. Lang, as fraudulent as to creditors. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

On the 2d day of March, 1874, one William B. Lang executed and delivered to the defendant, his daughter, a deed of the premises in question, which was recorded in June, 1874. In January, 1875, W. B. Lang & Co. made three notes, payable at a future date. These notes all matured in 1875, and before maturity passed into the hands of the late C. 1C. Garrison. Lang’s partner was one George M. Wheeler. Garrison’s executor recovered a judgment against Lang, J une 20,1887. The action was commenced against both.partners, but judgment was taken only against Lang, and the execution was issued on this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dygert v. RemerschniderNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  2. Royer Wheel Co. v. . FieldingNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Phillips v. . WoosterNew York Court of Appeals · 1867

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dalton v. BarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
  2. Rine v. ComptonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Baker v. PottsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  4. Baker v. PottsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  5. Strickland v. LarawayNew York Supreme Court · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API