Legal Opinion
Dragon v. Monahan Ford Corp.
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided January 6, 1989Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
David Goldstein, J.
Third-party defendant’s motion to dismiss the third-party complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) is granted.
The action was commenced against a used car dealer, Mona*689han Ford Corp. of Flushing (Monahan), to recover under General Business Law § 198-b, more commonly known as the "Used Car Lemon Law”. Monahan served a third-party complaint against the manufacturer, General Motors Corp., claiming a right to contribution under CPLR 1401. General Motors now moves to dismiss the third-party complaint, contending that the third-party complaint fails to state a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Victorson v. Bock Laundry Machine Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Board of Education v. Sargent, Webster, Crenshaw & FolleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Arthur Jaffee Associates v. Bilsco Auto Service, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Hole v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Lexow & Jenkins v. Hertz Commercial Leasing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.