Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Western Bank v. RaDec Const. Co., Inc.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1986No. 14858Published

1ConcurrenceHenderson, Justice

(specially concurring).

Although the inscription on the check does not, under these circumstances, via the majority opinion, defeat the Bank’s holder in due course status, certainly — as between the Carpet Center and RaDEC— the “memo” is of great significance. Most people in the business world pay by check. A denomination on the check can create an account stated, compromise, accord and satisfaction, or payment in full status. As between the Carpet Center and RaDEC, this is simply not a self-serving declaration or for recordkeeping or for informational purposes. It is a common practice to use…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Booker v. EverhartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Bowling Green, Inc. v. State Street Bank and Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
  3. Western State Bank v. First Union Bank & Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. First Nat. Bank of Linton v. Otto Huber & Sons, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 1975
  5. Bank of America v. ButterfieldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API