Legal Opinion

Southern California Telephone Co. v. Damenstein

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 14, 1947No. Civ. No. 15556PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

The plaintiff obtained judgment in Los Angeles County against Harris Damenstein, also known as H. F. Damenstein, also known as Harold Franks, for $2,584.05 on March 23, 1933. The defendant died September 19, 1945. Ceale Damenstein, his widow, was appointed special administratrix of his estate, and later was appointed executrix of the will of said deceased. On April 9,1946, upon motion of plaintiff, the superior court made an order substituting the “Estate of H. F. Damenstein,” and Ceale Damenstein, administratrix of the estate of H. F. Damenstein, as “defendant” in said action in place of H.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Butcher v. BrouwerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Beccuti v. Colombo Baking Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Hatch v. CalkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Helvey v. CastlesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. John P. Mills Organization, Inc. v. Shawmut Corp.California Supreme Court · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Harden v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Mann v. MuellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Visini v. VisiniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Bank of America v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Kellow v. LaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API