Legal Opinion
Alberta E. Burns, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. United States Railroad Retirement Board
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 25, 1983No. 81-2293PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GINSBURG.
GINSBURG, Circuit Judge:
Petitioner Burns seeks to proceed on behalf of a class in this challenge to a Railroad Retirement Board (“Board”) decision. She would represent
[a]ll persons who are receiving or who will receive both Social Security benefits and Railroad Retirement benefits and who have been or will be denied the right to retain 50% of their excess earnings pursuant to the actions of the Social Security Administration and the Railroad Retirement Board.
Motion of Petitioner for an Order Certifying the Class at 1, filed February 12,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Califano v. WestcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers, Local 283 v. ScofieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Jimenez v. WeinbergerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Michael McCarthy Arthur Waskow v. Richard G. KleindienstCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Teresa Barney and Randy Barney, Bonita Waldron, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated, Intervenor-Appellant v. Holzer Clinic, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Nancy Johnson v. United States Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Daskalea v. the Washington Humane SocietyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Linquist v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.