Nancy Johnson v. United States Railroad Retirement Board
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge MIKVA.
Opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part filed by Circuit Judge BUCKLEY.
MIKVA, Chief Judge:
In a bold challenge to judicial authority, the United States Railroad Retirement Board argues that it is free, when it chooses, to ignore the decisions of United States courts of appeals. Since 1981, the Board has cut off benefits for the spouses and widows of railroad workers after their dependent children turn sixteen, even though the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974, 45 U.S.C. §§ 231-231v (1988), says that they are entitled to benefits until…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lorraine POLASKI, Et Al., Appellees, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- National Environmental Development Association's Clean Air Project v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Seattle Audubon Society v. LyonsDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1994
- Casa De Maryland, Incorporated v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
- Heartland Plymouth Court MI, LLC v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Wendy Wagner v. Federal Election CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.