Legal Opinion

Department of Transportation v. Bollinger

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 20, 1996No. COA95-207PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Chief Judge.

The defendants first argue that plaintiff attempted to amend its complaint by introducing into evidence the Right of Way Agreement and that defendants should have been afforded the opportunity to amend their answer in order to plead the defenses of failure of consideration, fraud and forgery. We disagree.

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 136-103(5) (1993) mandates that a complaint filed in a DOT condemnation action shall contain or have attached, “A statement as to such liens or other encumbrances as the Department of Transportation is informed and believes are encumbrances upon said real…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Henry v. DeenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Cogdill v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Kaperonis v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Taylor v. GillespieCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. MandinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stetser v. Tap Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  2. McDevitt v. StacyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. Massey v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  4. Keith v. Northern Hospital DistrictCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  5. Keith v. Northern Hospital DistrictCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API