Miller v. Paulson
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Harrison District Court. — A. B. Thornell, Judge. The appellees are the daughters of the appellant. They succeeded below in having their mother found to be of unsound mind. A motion attacking the verdict was denied. A guardian of the property of Mrs. Paulson has been appointed, and has qualified. Mrs. Paulson appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtSalinger, J.
i. guardian and bear¡ngeonCy as petencylncom’ I. For testimony which discloses the conduct and mental condition of the appellant in the past, we will assume that, unless it has been overwhelmingly met, it is sufficient to sustain the verdict. This concession pro ara.uendo makes it needless particularize, even if it were practicable, Bat to illustrate what ultimate effect said testimony of the past condition and conduct should have on this trial, we point out one item which ap*220pellees will concede is as much of an aid to their case as anything that was adduced on their behalf. The dtem in…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ferguson v. FergusonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
3Cited by8 opinions
- Olson v. OlsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
- State Ex Rel. McPherson v. RakeySupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
- Richardson v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
- Stark v. Wright County State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
- Williams v. BudgettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.