Legal Opinion

Simpkins v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided March 11, 1976No. C-1-74-380PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

HOGAN, District Judge.

This is an action under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. § 51, et seq. and the Safety Appliance Act and Locomotive Boiler Inspection Act, 45 U.S.C. § 1, et seq. to recover for injuries sustained by plaintiff, an employee of the defendant Baltimore and Ohio Railway Company. Before the Court are cross motions for partial summary judgment as to count two of the complaint, the count dealing with the Safety Appliance Act and the Locomotive Boiler Inspection Act.

The facts of the case are undisputed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brady v. Terminal Railroad Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Lyle v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
  3. Tisneros v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
  4. Southern Railway Company v. Earl N. BryanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Willard Green v. River Terminal Railway Co., Third Party Jerald E. Dawson, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  2. Kenneth v. Angell v. The Chesapeake and Ohio Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
  3. Edward E. Pinkham v. Maine Central Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  4. Balough v. Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  5. Green v. River Terminal Railway Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API