Legal Opinion

Tisneros v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 3, 1952No. 10534_1PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff’s suit against his employer to recover damages because of the latter’s alleged violation of the Boiler Inspection Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 23, having resulted in a judgment in his favor, defendant appeals. It rightfully asserts that no question of negligence is involved and that its duty under the statute, if applicable, is absolute. It seeks reversal, however, because, as it contends, (1), the icy condition of the steps and grabirons of the locomotive complained of did not constitute “an unnecessary peril to life or limb of railroad employees” within the meaning of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lyle v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
  2. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. EdgeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Kenneth v. Angell v. The Chesapeake and Ohio Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
  2. Carolyn Crockett v. The Long Island RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  3. Jerry J. Calabritto v. New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  4. Michael Dennis Estes v. Southern Pacific Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  5. Bradley LeDure v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API