Legal Opinion

Hortenstine v. Jackson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 2, 1956No. 6579PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORTHCUTT, Justice.

This is an action upon a promissory' note and for real estate commission. Appellee sued appellant upon a promissory note for principal, interest and attorney’s fees and, in the same cause of action, alleged that appellant, by letter to appellee, admitted commission liability of ■ $10,250 of which $5,000 was evidenced by a promissory note sued upon herein. Further pleading that appellant thereupon, in writing, acknowledged his obligations to pay the appellee the sum of $5,250 in addition to the note obligation. Appellant, by sworn answer, pleaded that the note in question…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. De La Vega v. LeagueTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Adams v. Bankers' Life Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  3. Ball v. CundiffCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pitts v. AshcraftCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  2. Dorn v. CartwrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  3. Laurito v. McVeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. McAden v. Soil Improvement CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  5. Hortenstine v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API