Legal Opinion

McAden v. Soil Improvement Corporation

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 28, 1965No. 7664PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Justice.

Plaintiff-appellee, Soil Improvement Corporation, sued defendant-appellant, Don McAden, individually, for actual damages, exemplary damages, and attorney’s fees because of an alleged wrongful levy of an Alias Execution by the Sheriff’s office of Grayson County on part of a carload of fertilizer alleged to belong to Soil Improvement Corporation. The levy was made on September 28,1963. The fertilizer, at that time, was in the name of Dave Tinkle, consignee. The Alias Execution was issued on a judgment in favor of Don McAden Company, a Corporation, against David Tinkle. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Landers v. East Texas Salt Water Disposal Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Riley v. Industrial Finance Service Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Royal Petroleum Corporation v. DennisTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Royal Petroleum Corp. v. DennisTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Hortenstine v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Baldwin, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
  2. Tuscany, LLC v. Western States Excavating Pipe & Boring, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API