Legal Opinion

United States v. Doyle Sheets

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 10, 2016No. 15-10555PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARL E. STEWART, Chief Judge.

Defendant-Appellant Doyle Brent Sheets (“Sheets”) pleaded guilty to an offense related to a scheme to defraud the United States Department of Education (“DOE”). The district court ordered each defendant involved in the scheme to pay restitution in various amounts. When the district court indicated that it intended to return certain garnished funds to Michael Otto (“Otto”), one of Sheets’ eo-defen-dants, the Government requested that Otto’s garnished funds be applied to the overall outstanding restitution obligation. The district court denied the Government’s…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Paroline v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. United States v. Alan N. ScottCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. OllisonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. HuntCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Clarence BuckCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. Howard HalversonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. YalincakCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
  4. United States v. Daniela Gozes-WagnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  5. United States v. OchoaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2023

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API