Legal Opinion

Doe v. Buongirno, No. Cv-00-0124271-S (Jul. 30, 2002)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided July 30, 2002No. CV-00-0124271-SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (#112)

The defendants Norwich Roman Catholic Diocesan Corporation (Diocesan CT Page 9613 Corporation) and Daniel A. Hart,1 Bishop of the Norwich Diocese (Hart), move for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part as to Hart and denied as to the Diocesan Corporation.

Facts

The plaintiff, John Doe,2 filed the three count complaint in this action on June 7, 2000. The moving defendants seek summary judgment as to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Dubay v. IrishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. Moses v. Diocese of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  4. Maffucci v. Royal Park Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  5. Elliott v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API