Dittman v. Spotten, No. 541013 (Apr. 27, 1998)
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION The plaintiff has moved for summary judgment and riled a memorandum of law and other documents to support his position.
He is specifically moving for judgment on the issue of liability only on the grounds that the defendant was negligent per se in that he violated C.G.S. § 14-300 (b) and/or §14-300 (c).
The defendant denies violating either of these statutes and asserts that the doctrine of negligence per se does not apply here because C.G.S. § 14-300 (d) states:
"In any civil action arising under…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fogarty v. RashawSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Maffucci v. Royal Park Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996