Legal Opinion
United States v. Messino
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided December 19, 1994No. 93 CR 294PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ALESIA, District Judge.
Before the court are various remaining pretrial motions. The court has previously described the Superseding Indictment in this case. See United States v. Messino, 852 F.Supp. 652, 653-54 (N.D.Ill.1994); see also 865 F.Supp. 511 (N.D.Ill. Oct. 21, 1994); 855 F.Supp. 973 (N.D.Ill.1994); 855 F.Supp. 955 (N.D.Ill.1994); 852 F.Supp. 657 (N.D.Ill. 1994); 842 F.Supp. 1107 (N.D.Ill.1994). The court therefore will proceed directly to disposition of the motions.
I. DEFENDANT CHRISTOPHER RICHARD MESSINO’S MOTION TO PRECLUDE TESTIMONY ABOUT DESTROYED…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. James Daniel Good Real PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Alexander v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Property Identified as Lot Numbered 718District Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- United States v. MessinoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995