Legal Opinion
Shade v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided May 10, 1990No. 2 CA-CV 89-0171PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Judge.
Michael and Priscilla Shade appeal from the trial court’s order granting of summary judgment in favor of appellee, finding that coverage did not extend beyond the period set forth in the insurance policy issued to Douglas and Constance Jewell. For the following reasons, we affirm.
FACTS
Michael Shade was severely injured in a motorcycle accident in June 1979. The Shades instituted suit against several defendants on various negligence theories. All defendants prevailed except the Jewells who failed to appear. The Jewells, owners of Jewell’s Cycle City, were allegedly…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Gordinier v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Gulf Insurance v. GrishamArizona Supreme Court · 1980
- Mozes v. DaruCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. LongdenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Morgan Ex Rel. Clark v. American Family Mut. Ins.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Morgan Ex Rel. Clark v. American Family Mut. Ins.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Morgan ex rel. Morgan v. American Family Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Morgan ex rel. Morgan v. American Family Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Morgan v. American FamilyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009