Legal Opinion · Dissent

Morgan ex rel. Morgan v. American Family Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 18, 2009No. 07-16278Published

1DissentTymkovich, Circuit Judge

Arizona law places important limitations on the reasonable expectations doctrine that apply in this case. Most importantly, the reasonable expectations doctrine does not operate as a per se bar against named-insured exclusions. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Falness (Falness I), 178 Ariz. 281, 872 P.2d 1233, 1234 (Ariz.1994) (holding that a named-insured exclusion “is not invalid on its face”). But a rigid application of this circuit’s follow up decision in State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Falness (Falness II), 39 F.3d 966, 968 (9th Cir.1994), will lead to just such a per se rule.

As is…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Gordinier v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Averett v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance v. BarerraArizona Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API