Morgan ex rel. Morgan v. American Family Mutual Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1DissentTymkovich, Circuit Judge
Arizona law places important limitations on the reasonable expectations doctrine that apply in this case. Most importantly, the reasonable expectations doctrine does not operate as a per se bar against named-insured exclusions. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Falness (Falness I), 178 Ariz. 281, 872 P.2d 1233, 1234 (Ariz.1994) (holding that a named-insured exclusion “is not invalid on its face”). But a rigid application of this circuit’s follow up decision in State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Falness (Falness II), 39 F.3d 966, 968 (9th Cir.1994), will lead to just such a per se rule.
As is…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Gordinier v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Averett v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance v. BarerraArizona Supreme Court · 2001
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.