Legal Opinion

Dority v. Hiller

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 25, 1999No. 96C-11125; CA A99563PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

Plaintiffs 1 brought this action to quiet title to real property and for damages on theories of trespass, private nuisance and public nuisance against defendants. 2 Defendants raised counterclaims seeking a declaration of a right to maintain an irrigation pipeline across plaintiffs’ property. Defendants then moved for partial summary judgment against plaintiffs on the question of whether defendants possessed an irrevocable license for the use of plaintiffs’ property for the pipeline. ORCP 47. The trial court granted defendants’ motion and entered judgment in their favor. ORCP 67 B. 3…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bernards v. LinkOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Curtis v. La Grande Hydraulic Water Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Rose Et Ux. v. Denn Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Ewing v. RheaOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Heisley v. EastmanOregon Supreme Court · 1921

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Andrews v. R.W. Hays Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. Splinters, Inc. v. Andersen/WeitzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. Boyer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API