Legal Opinion
In Re Urban
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas
Decided May 30, 2001No. 19-20328PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON TRUSTEE’S MOTION FOR TURNOVER AND OBJECTION TO AMENDED CLAIM OF EXEMPTION
ROBERT E. NUGENT, Bankruptcy Judge.
This case comes before the Court on the Trustee’s Motion For Turnover And Objection To Amended Claim Of Exemption. The trustee seeks turnover from the debtors of $1,979.65, representing wages earned as of the date of bankruptcy but paid post-petition. Debtors assert that seventy-five percent (75%) of these wages are exempt under K.S.A. § 60-2310. The trustee objects to the claimed exemption. Michael and Vickie Urban, the debtors, are represented by David J. Lund.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Kokoszka v. BelfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Lawrence v. Jahn (In Re Lawrence)District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1998
- In Re Odell Lynard Sanders, Debtor. David Dorsey Distributing, Incorporated v. Odell Lynard SandersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Neely v. St. Francis Hospital & School of Nursing, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1964
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lampe v. Williamson (In Re Lampe)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Carbaugh v. Carbaugh (In Re Carbaugh)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- In Re ThumUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2005
- In Re JonesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2005
- In re FosterUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.