Legal Opinion

Lee v. City of Ames

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 12, 1925PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Arthur, J.- —

The paving project involved started in the fall of 1915, when a resolution of necessity for paving some principal streets of the city of Ames was adopted by the city council. On September 20, 1915, construction was ordered. In December, plans and specifications were approved. Clauses oi the specifications having some bearing on matters m eon- , troversy are:

“ (1) * * * and no bidder will be awarded the contract for extra excavation unless he receives the award for the corresponding paving. Any bidder submitting prices on any one of the different types of paving must also submit…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Elliot v. Minneapolis CitySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  2. Humboldt County v. Incorporated Town of Dakota CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  3. Price v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Dubbert v. City of Cedar FallsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Johnson County Savings Bank v. City of CrestonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  2. Iowa-Nebraska Light & Power Co. v. City of VilliscaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
  3. Underwood v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Iowa Electric Light & Power Co. v. Incorporated Town of Grand JunctionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  5. Flynn Construction Co. v. LeiningerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API