Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re the Marriage of Timmons

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1980No. 46571Published

1DissentDolliver, J.

(dissenting) — I agree with the majority that in a custody modification proceeding RCW 26.09.260(1) allows consideration of predecree facts which were unknown to the court at the time of the prior uncontested dissolution. I do not agree, however, with the conclusion of the majority that the predecree facts provide substantial evidence for a change of custody. Therefore, I dissent.

RCW 26.09.260 states the court shall not modify a prior custody decree unless "a change has occurred in the circumstances of the child or his custodian and that the modification is necessary to serve the bests…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of RoordaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  2. Anderson v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  3. Dykes v. DykesWashington Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API