In Re the Marriage of Timmons
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentDolliver, J.
(dissenting) — I agree with the majority that in a custody modification proceeding RCW 26.09.260(1) allows consideration of predecree facts which were unknown to the court at the time of the prior uncontested dissolution. I do not agree, however, with the conclusion of the majority that the predecree facts provide substantial evidence for a change of custody. Therefore, I dissent.
RCW 26.09.260 states the court shall not modify a prior custody decree unless "a change has occurred in the circumstances of the child or his custodian and that the modification is necessary to serve the bests…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re the Marriage of RoordaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
- Anderson v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- Dykes v. DykesWashington Supreme Court · 1966