Legal Opinion

Dykes v. Dykes

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1966No. 38719PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

By writ of certiorari, orders entered after a consolidated trial of two related causes are before us for review. Since both orders treat with the custody of minor *875children, the procedure is proper. Rule on Appeal 57, RCW vol. O.

The first order modifies a decree of divorce; it gives to Charles Dykes, respondent-father, the custody of his three minor children. The second order denies the petition of Jack and Edna Kerrigan, the maternal grandparents of the minor children, to be appointed guardians of the persons of said children.

Basically, this is a factual review.

April 13, 1959, Sharon Dykes…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sweeny v. SweenyWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Kehus v. EuteneierWashington Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of TimmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. In Re the Marriage of TimmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. In Re the Marriage of TimmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API