Legal Opinion
State v. Glindemann
Washington Supreme Court
Decided March 3, 1904No. 4916PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of tlie superior court for Spokane county, Richardson, J., entered June 22, 1903, upon -a trial and conviction of the crime of incest.
1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.
Appellant was charged with the crime, of incest committed with his own daughter. Having been tried and convicted, he has appealed to this court. He first assigns as error that the court overruled his demurrer to the information. The essential part of the information is as follows:
“That the said defendant John Glindeman, in the county of Spokane and state of Washington, on or about the 1st day of January, 1902, did wilfully, unlawfully and feloniously have sexual commerce with and carnally know one Marie Glindeman, the said Marie Glindeman then and there being a female and a daughter of said…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Simon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1892
- State v. DanaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1887
- State v. WymanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1887
- State v. McGilveryWashington Supreme Court · 1898
- State v. BullingerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. StrasburgWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- McCaskill v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
- State v. DuncanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- State v. JuddSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- State v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.