Legal Opinion

Mattix v. Swepston

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1913PublishedCited by 21 opinions

PROM SHELBt., ■ Appeal from the Circuit Court of Shelby County to the Court of Civil Appeals, and by writ of certiorari from the Court of Civil Appeals to the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lansden

This case is before us upon petition of.the defendant, Swepston, for writs of certiorari to the judgment of the court of civil appeals. The only question for determination is whether the cause of action asserted by the declaration against the defendant is local or transitory.

A brief statement of the case made in the declaration is that the plaintiffs bought a boundary of timber in Crittenden county, Ark., from one Maudlin. The .contract of purchase gave the plaintiffs five years in, which to cut and remove the timber, and also granted to them a right of way over adjacent lands of Maudlin, for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hoyt Post v. CampauMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Nunnelly v. Southern Iron Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Gunther v. DranbauerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
  4. Long v. MayberryTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  5. State ex rel. Barrett v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Oman v. DeliusTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Manhattan Oil Co. v. MosbyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  3. Phillips v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1984
  4. Five Star Express, Inc. v. DavisTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  5. The Pointe, LLC v. Lake Management Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API