Hughes v. Orangeburg Mfg. Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before DantzeER, J., Orangeburg, December, 1907. Action by Julia Hughes against Orangeburg Manufacturing Company. From order refusing motion to make complaint more definite and certain, defendant appeals. cite: 13 Ency. P. & P., 908; Dab. on M. & S., secs. 836, 854; 69 S. C., 530; 73 S. C., 398; 75 S. C., 103; 78 S. C., 337; 54 N. W., 1035; 31 N. W., 163; 36 S. W., 1066; 31 At. R., 344; 35 At. R., 486; 30 So. R., 590. cite: 66 S. C., 13; 68 S. C., 304; 69 S. C„ 373.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Woods.
This appeal is from an order denying the motion to require the plaintiff to malee her complaint more definite and certain. According to the allegations of the complaint, while the plaintiff was operating a speeder frame in defendant’s cotton factory her hand was caught and crushed. The wrongful conduct of the defendant was thus set out: “That the said frame, owing to the recklessness, wilfulness, wantonness and negligence of the said defendant, was in such a poorly equipped and defective condi tioo as to render it exceedingly ‘hard…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lynch v. Spartan MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
- Moore v. Catawba Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
3Cited by12 opinions
- Spurlin v. Colprovia Products Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
- Pendleton v. Columbia Railway, Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
- Miles v. Charleston Light & Water Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
- Beard v. Paul Motor Company, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
- Woodward v. WoodwardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.