Legal Opinion

Lynch v. Spartan Mills

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 8, 1903PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Action by J. H. Lynch against Spartan Mills. From an order requiring, plaintiff to amend his complaint, he appeals. cite: 22 Stat, 693; 61 S. C., 170;’63 S. C., 363; 64 S. C., 495. cites: Code..Proc., 11; 42 S. C., 547; 52 S. C., 587.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gary.

Statement of facts. — -The plaintiff appeals from that part of an order requiring him to make his complaint definite and certain in the particulars therein mentioned. The first paragraph of the complaint alleges the corporate existence of the defendant. The other paragraphs of the complaint are as follows:

“2. That on the 31st day of July, A. D. 1901, plaintiff was employed by defendant company as a picker, in its said factory. Flis duty was tO' run the picker machine, keep it in clean condition, and sweep the floor around it and see…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1897

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pendleton v. Columbia Railway, Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
  2. Bonner v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
  3. Hughes v. Orangeburg Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
  4. Cooper v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  5. Jumper v. Dorchester Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API