Woodward v. Woodward
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Sease, J., Lee, October Term, 1909. Action by Emma W. Woodward against Hosea W. and Henry Woodward. From order refusing to require plaintiff to make her complaint more definite and certain, defendants appeál. ' • ' , cite: 73 S. 'C. 29; Bliss on Plead. 316. cite: Order is not appealable: 50 S. C. 65. On main issue: 67 S. C. 495; Maxwell’s Code Plead. 13.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Hydrick.
This is an action for dower. The complaint alleges: “That on the day of October or December, 1888,” the plaintiff and John Frierson Woodward were married, and that, during her coverture with him, he “was seized and possessed in fee of the ■following tracts of land.” Thereafter thirteen tracts are particularly described in the complaint, but not in numerical or successive order. After the description of eleven tracts, each under a separate subdivision, the fifth paragraph of the complaint follows, in which it is stated which of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Harbert v. Atlanta & Charlotte Air Line Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
- Hughes v. Orangeburg Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
- Cooper v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
- McCandless v. MobleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
- Strait v. British & American Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Winchester v. United InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
- Sparks v. D. M. Dew & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
- Friendship Baptist Church v. HillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
- Meyer v. OwensSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
- Rowland Warehouse Co. v. Sumter Packing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931