Legal Opinion

Hyde v. Quinn

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 8, 1989No. 89-117PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

This is the third appeal involving a suit by taxpayers of Sewer Improvement District #142. In Martin v. Quinn, 294 Ark. 60, 740 S.W.2d 627 (1987), we affirmed the Little Rock Board of Directors’ refusal to remove the district’s commissioners from office. In Henderson Methodist Church v. Sewer Improvement Dist. No. 142, 294 Ark. 188, 741 S.W.2d 272 (1987), taxpayers alleged fraud was committed by the commissioners in assessing property within the district.

In this lawsuit, filed October 16, 1987, taxpayers seek to recover money they claim was wrongfully expended by the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ratliff v. MossSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  2. Swofford v. StaffordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  3. Smith v. RaoneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  4. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  5. Henderson Methodist Church v. Sewer Improvement District No. 142Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Standridge v. StandridgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance v. Deloitte & ToucheDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1992
  3. Resolution Trust Corp. v. KerrDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1992
  4. Cook v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991
  5. Technology Partners, Inc. v. Regions BankCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API