Legal Opinion

Baity v. Workforce Safety & Insurance

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 2004No. 20040096PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMANN, Justice.

[¶ 1] Esther Baity appealed from a district court judgment affirming an order of Workforce Safety and Insurance (“WSI”) declaring her to be permanently and totally disabled and deciding the date when her supplementary benefits begin under N.D.C.C. § 65-05.2-01. We affirm, concluding WSI correctly determined Baity *715was eligible for supplementary benefits beginning September 11, 2002, the date its cyclic review committee declared Baity permanently and totally disabled, rather than beginning July 1, 2001, the date Baity claimed evidence established she was permanently and totally…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Tooley v. AlmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Scott v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Grand Forks Professional Baseball, Inc. v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Greenwood v. MooreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fettig v. Workplace Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  2. WSI v. BoechlerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
  3. WSI v. BoechlerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
  4. Baity v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API