Legal Opinion
Brooks v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 3, 2024No. Civil Action No. 2019-2065Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HAZELL BROOKS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 19-cv-2065 (CRC) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs, three blind vending-facility operators, renew their challenge to the District of Columbia’s administration of a federal program that gives preferences to visually impaired vendors. They concede that three of their claims are precluded under this Court’s decision in Brooks v. District of Columbia (“Brooks I”),
375 F. Supp. 3d 41
(D.D.C. 2019), aff’d sub nom. Patten v. District of Columbia,
9 F.4th 921
(D.C. Cir.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Sparrow, Victor H. v. United Airlines IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Food & Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Gustave-Schmidt v. ChaoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.