Legal Opinion

Duckworth v. Mosier

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 31, 1892No. 534PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From the Morgan Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCrumpacker, J.

This action was commenced by Mosier against Duckworth, before a justice of the peace, for *268the alleged forcible entry and detainer of a tract of land, and for damages for its detention.

Plaintiff had judgment for possession of the land and eleven dollars damages, before the justice. The defendant appealed from such judgment, to the Morgan circuit court, where the cause was tried by a jury and a verdict returned as follows: “ We the jury find for the plaintiff and assess his damages at fifteen dollars.” Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff for the amount of the verdict and costs. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Goodwine v. BarnettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. McDadeIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Parsley v. EskewIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Hall v. DurhamIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. CoyleIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Knowlton v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Colliery Engineer Co. v. American Car & Foundry Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API