Horgen v. Franklin Co-Operative Creamery Ass'n
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Stone, Justice.
Action for personal injuries wherein plaintiff appeals from a judgment for the defendants.
At the close of the evidence defendants moved for a directed verdict upon the ground that the action was barred by the provisions of the workmen’s compensation act hereinafter considered. Adopting a commendable practice, the ruling upon that motion was reserved, and there was submitted to the jury only the question of damages, which were fixed by the verdict at $7,100. Considering that the statute in question barred any recovery, the court then ordered judgment for defendants.
The Northwest…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rasmussen v. George Benz & SonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Podgorski v. KerwinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Gile v. Yellow Cab Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- McGrath v. Northwestern Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Duus v. DuusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
3Cited by10 opinions
- Franklin Co-Operative Creamery Ass'n v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Taylor v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Anderson v. Interstate Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Smith v. Kedney Warehouse Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.