Legal Opinion

Horgen v. Franklin Co-Operative Creamery Ass'n

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 12, 1935No. 30,411PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stone, Justice.

Action for personal injuries wherein plaintiff appeals from a judgment for the defendants.

At the close of the evidence defendants moved for a directed verdict upon the ground that the action was barred by the provisions of the workmen’s compensation act hereinafter considered. Adopting a commendable practice, the ruling upon that motion was reserved, and there was submitted to the jury only the question of damages, which were fixed by the verdict at $7,100. Considering that the statute in question barred any recovery, the court then ordered judgment for defendants.

The Northwest…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rasmussen v. George Benz & SonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  2. Podgorski v. KerwinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  3. Gile v. Yellow Cab Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  4. McGrath v. Northwestern Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  5. Duus v. DuusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Franklin Co-Operative Creamery Ass'n v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  2. Taylor v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  3. Anderson v. Interstate Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  4. Smith v. Kedney Warehouse Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  5. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API