Banning Cotton Mills v. George Muse Clothing Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
1. “A proper construction of the statute is that the answer of the garnishee is not too late at any time if it comes before or at the time the plaintiff moves to enter up judgment against the garnishee for the amount of the judgment he has obtained against the principal debtor.” Owen v. Moseley, 161 Ga. 62, 68 (129 S. E. 787).
2. Where the answer of a garnishee (a corporation) was signed and filed by the garnishee’s attorneys, but was not verified, and where, upon motion of the plaintiff to dismiss the answer for such want of verification, the garnishee moved to amend the answer by having it…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Plant & Son v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
- Owen v. MoseleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. DickersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
- Simplex Machine Co. v. Greenberg & Bond Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
3Cited by3 opinions
- Snooks v. Factory Square, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Snooks v. Factory Square, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Snooks v. Factory Square, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973