Legal Opinion
Snooks v. Factory Square, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided September 6, 1973No. 48081PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hall, Presiding Judge.
Plaintiffs in a garnishment action appeal from the order overruling their exceptions and objections to the answer of the garnishee.
The sole issue is whether a particular writing was an "answer” capable of later amendment. In response to the summons of garnishment served on August 18,1972, the garnishee company sent to the clerk of the court a letter on garnishee’s corporate letterhead, which read:
"Re: Garnishment No. 72-1095
L. Schwartz [the employee whose wages were subject of the garnishment]
Subject is no longer employed by this company. Termination and last wages drawn…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Neal v. Davis Foundry & Machine WorksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Davis v. MetzgerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Simplex Machine Co. v. Greenberg & Bond Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
- Aycock v. Royal InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Simmons v. J. A. Jones Construction Co. Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Whitby v. MaloyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Robinson v. ReardenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Skipper v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Snooks v. Factory Square, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973