Legal Opinion

Taft v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 3, 1917PublishedCited by 8 opinions

ActioN for damages, tried before Harding, J., at May Term, 1917, of Pitt. Plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtWaiker, J.

This suit was brought to recover damages for injury to furniture shipped over defendant’s line in interstate commerce, the amount claimed being $62.89. The court held, and so adjudged, that plaintiff was not entitled to recover, as he failed to comply with the following stipulation of the bill of lading: “Claims for loss, damage or delay must be made, in writing, to the carrier at the point of delivery or at the point of origin, within four months after the delivery of the property, or, in case of failure to make delivery, then within four months after a reasonable time for delivery has…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Queen of the PacificSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Reynolds v. Adams Express Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  3. Kime v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  4. Kime v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  5. Baldwin v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mewborn v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  2. St. Sing v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. Davis v. John L. Roper Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1924
  4. Mann v. Fairfield & Elizabeth City Transportation Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  5. Schaff v. Ike Exstein Bro.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API