Kime v. Southern Railway Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Apppal from W. J. Adams, J., at the May Term, 1910, of ALAMANCE. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Clark, 0. J.
This was an action for damages to a-earload of horses while in'transit from Richmond, Va., to Burlington, N. C., caused by the negligence of the defendant. The jury found that the horses had been injured by the negligence of the defendant, and assessed the damages at $300. The plaintiff admits in his evidence that on the afternoon when he unloaded the said, horses at Burlington, N. C., he did not give any notice to the agent of the defendant, informing him of said injuries or of his intention of making a claim for said damages. His excuse for not doing so was that the agent had…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hopkins v. Norfolk & Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
- Hinkle, Craig & Co. v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
- Snider v. Newell.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Wood v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Austin v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hopper Paper Co. v. Baltimore & O.R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
- Hinkle v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
- Kime v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Baldwin v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Kime v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.