Legal Opinion

Mewborn v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 1, 1915PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Civil action. The action was to recover damages to live-stock, alleged to have been negligently injured in shipment over defendant roads, in March, 1912. Defendants denied liability. The evidence having been submitted, on motion, there was judgment of nonsuit as to each and all of defendants, and plaintiffs excepted and appealed. There were facts in evidence tending to show that, on or about 8 March, 1912, plaintiffs, under a live-stock contract, shipped a lot of horses and mules from Flemingsburg, Ky., to Kinston, N.C. passing over the Cincinnati and Flemingsburg Railroad, the initial…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Riverside MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. of Texas v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Co. v. Varnville Furniture Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Washington Horse Exchange v. L. & N. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  2. Fuller v. Virginia & Carolina Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. Morris v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Aydlett v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  5. Aydlett v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API