Legal Opinion
State v. Treadway
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided December 7, 1960No. 1174PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STRUCKMEYER, Chief Justice,
This matter arises on a certified question from the Superior Court of Maricopa County. The question is:
“When a defendant has been held to answer by an order made more than thirty (30) days prior to the filing of an information by the County Attorney would Rule 80, and Rule 236, of the Rules of Criminal Procedure, A.R.S. 1956, preclude the showing of good cause by the County Attorney for the delay in filing an information and operate as a mandate requiring that the court, upon motion of a defendant, quash an information so filed more than thirty (30) days after entry…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Prideaux v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1936
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. Old West Bonding Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Sheridan v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- State of Arizona v. Brady Whitman, Jr.Arizona Supreme Court · 2014
- State of Arizona v. Brady Whitman Jr.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- Continental Insurance Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.