Murray Co. v. Citizens' Oil Mill
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of South Carolina, at Greenville; Henry H. Watkins, Judge. Action at law by the Murray Company against the Citizens’ Oil Mill. Judgment for plaintiff, from which it brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
WADDIEE, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff in error was plaintiff, and' the defendant in error defendant, in the court below, and will be referred to herein as plaintiff and defendant.
This is an action at law, arising out of a contract entered into between the plaintiff and the defendant, on the 4th of August, 1919. whereby the defendant contracted with plaintiff to purchase certain cotton seed oil machinery, upon the terms and conditions set forth in the contract. The plaintiff sues to recover for an alleged balance-due it under the contract of $20,508.77, the details of which claim will be…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Phillips & Colby Construction Co. v. SeymourSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Van Winkle & Co. v. WilkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
- Griffith v. NewellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
- Wall v. St. Joseph Artesian Ice & Cold Storage Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1905
- Johnson v. North Baltimore Bottle Glass Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1906
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. GonderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926