Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. R. C. Motor Lines v. Florida Railroad Commission
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided March 28, 1936PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.
This was a mandamus to require the Florida Railroad Commission to grant to the relators a certificate of registration (Public Convenience and Necessity) to engage as an exclusively interstate operator in private contract carriage by motor vehicle from Baltimore, Maryland, to Jacksonville, Florida, over that certain portion of the public road from the border of the State of Florida, to Jacksonville, Florida, known as State Highway Route No. 3, U. S. Highway Route No. 17.
The Railroad Commission asserts in defense of its position that although the application here involved was filed by relators…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Buck v. KuykendallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- George W. Bush & Sons Co. v. MaloySupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Bradley v. Public Util. Comm'n of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- West Flagler Amusement Co. v. State Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
- State Ex Rel. West Flagler Amusement Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Republican State Executive Committee v. GrahamSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
- State Ex Rel. L. & L. Freight Lines, Inc. v. DouglassSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
- Stewart v. MackSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- Cochran v. M & M Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
- In re South Florida Freightways, Inc.Florida Public Service Commission · 1955