Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Mack

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 28, 1953PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLT, Associate Justice.

The constitutionality of section 323.01, Revised Florida Statutes of 1941, F.S.A., and particularly section 323.04 thereof and rule 3 of the Florida Railroad and Public Utilities Commission has been brought into question by the petition for certiorari in this case on the ground that said statute and said rule violate Article II and Article III, Section 1, of the Constitution of the State of Florida, F.S.A., and that the provisions thereof contravene the due process and equal protection clause of the 14th amendment of the Constitution of the United States.

This act which…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smith v. CahoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Florida Motor Lines, Inc. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  3. Riley v. LawsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  4. Central Truck Lines, Inc. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  5. Dickenson v. Cahoon, SheriffSupreme Court of Florida · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Eaton v. Coal Par of West Virginia, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1984
  2. Stewart v. MackSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  3. State ex rel. Florida Railroad & Public Utilities Commission v. IngallsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  4. Gray v. Tamiami Trail Tours, Inc., Circuit Court of the 14th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Bay County1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API